Cases

• Employee involved

  Alexey Stanchin

• Process description

  As part of an on-site tax audit, the tax authority concluded that the client, a general contractor for construction work, was affiliated with a counterparty.
  
  In particular, the tax authority believed that:
  (1) the transaction with the counterparty was not real
  (2) The counterparties had no sources of VAT refunds as well as the necessary material and technical resources for performance of the work undertaken.
  
  In view of the above, the Tax Compliance team offered to prepare "defensive" documents and evidence of good faith of the taxpayer.
  
  We helped the client develop a legal position confirming:
  (1) the reality of performing construction and installation works by the disputed companies
  (2) the lack of controllability between the participants of the contractual relations
  (3) the unreasonableness of allocating the VAT gaps to the disputed counterparties.
  
  The claims were appealed to the tax authority and to a higher authority.

• Result

  As part of a pre-trial appeal, the tax authority accepted the taxpayer's arguments and reduced the size of the claim, and then we secured a full reversal from the higher tax authority.

• Employee involved

  Alexey Stanchin

• Process description

  Following an on-site audit, the tax authority concluded that the taxpayer had created a formal document flow to understate the tax base. In particular, the tax authority believed that: (1) the client had methodological violations under VAT; (2) the use of zinc dust in production was overstated; (3) an agency agreement was concluded with a PE for tax saving purposes.
  
  The Tax Compliance team helped the client develop a legal position to challenge the results of an on-site tax audit substantiating:
  
  (1) incorrect application by the tax authority of the methodology for determining import deductions based on the organisation's accounting policy;
  (2) the use of zinc dust in production;
  (3) the existence of a business purpose in concluding the agency agreement.

• Result

  The tax authority partly accepted the taxpayer's arguments and the tax claim was reduced by 46%.

• Employees involved

  Mikhail Begunov, Nikita Zharov, Alexander Dmitriev

• Process description

  The tax authority conducted an on-site audit of the client for all taxes and levies for a three-year period. As a result of the on-site tax audit, the auditors made claims on transactions with a number of counterparties. In the tax authority's view, the client had recorded business transactions with 7 technical entities in breach of Article 54.1 of the Tax Code.
  
  Tax Compliance specialists helped the client to successfully complete an on-site tax audit. In particular, in the course of the project the Team:
  
  (1) helped develop a legal position as part of the preparation of objections to the act;
  (2) represented the client in the meetings with the tax authorities;
  (3) accompanied the client in the framework of additional tax control measures.
  
  Due to the team's assistance, the testimony of the general director of one of the disputed counterparties was admitted into the tax audit file. The CEO's testimony helped convince the auditors that all of the client's business transactions with one of the disputed counterparties were real.

• Result

  The tax authority's additional charge was reduced by 40%.

Advising a client on obtaining the status of an accredited IT company

• Employees involved

  Mikhail Begunov, Nikita Zharov

• Process description

  The Tax Compliance team was faced with the task of assessing the prospects for the client to obtain the status of an accredited IT company.

• Result

  Based on the results of the analysis, the Tax Compliance team came to the conclusion that in the current period the client does not meet the conditions established by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 30, 2022 N 1729. In addition, the Tax Compliance team developed a road map in which it outlined a possible algorithm of actions that will allow the client to apply for the status of an accredited IT company in the next period. The client's management approved the roadmap and decided to implement the Tax Compliance proposals in order to ensure the possibility to apply for the status of an accredited IT company in the next period

• Employees involved

  Mikhail Begunov, Nikita Zharov

• Process description

  The Tax Compliance team had the task of analyzing the personal income tax risks that may arise for a shareholder of a large catering chain due to participation in a CFC. Since the establishment of the foreign organization, the client has not submitted a CFC notification to the tax authority. At the time of the opinion, the statute of limitations under the relevant article of the Tax Code had not expired. The client was interested in the analysis and cost estimate of tax risks for failure to submit CFC information.

• Result

  As a result of the analysis, Tax Compliance specialists prepared an opinion describing the tax risks and estimated their costs.